Effectiveness of the GASING method on mathematical problem-solving skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v5i4.720Keywords:
elementary Mathematics, GASING method, problem-solving, Polya’s frameworkAbstract
Mathematical problem-solving skills are an important component of the elementary school Mathematics curriculum, yet they remain a challenge for students in Indonesia. This study aims to test the effectiveness of the Gampang, Asyik, dan Menyenangkan (GASING) method as an alternative learning resource for developing fourth-grade students' mathematical problem-solving competencies. The study used a quasi-experimental design with unequal control groups involving 60 students at SDN 63 Surabayo, Agam Regency, West Sumatra (30 experimental, 30 control). The instrument consisted of eight (8) items based on Polya's validated four-step framework and measured abilities before and after treatment. The experimental group obtained higher post-test scores with a significant effect and greater learning improvement. The GASING method eliminated low-level learning outcomes and placed most students in the high-level category. These findings support integrating the GASING method as an evidence-based learning resource in the elementary school Mathematics curriculum, particularly in contexts that emphasize higher-order thinking skills and differentiated learning.
References
Anugraheni, I., Gufron, A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2025). The impact of realistic problem-based learning on mathematical connection abilities: Evidence from elementary schools in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1-16.
Azzumar, F., & Juandi, D. (2023). Concrete-pictorial-abstract approaches to Mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 1-11.
Barnes, A. (2020). Enjoyment in learning Mathematics: Its role as a potential barrier to children’s perseverance in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(1), 45-63.
Buknoni, Y., Wahyudin, W., & Iriawan, S. B. (2026). Efektivitas metode GASING untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep bilangan bulat di sekolah. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 16(2), 194-203.
Ebner, S., MacDonald, M. K., Grekov, P., & Aspiranti, K. B. (2025). A meta-analytic review of the concrete-representational-abstract math approach. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 40(1), 31-42.
Fitriani, E. (2025). The effectiveness of Polya’s problem-solving strategy in enhancing mathematical word problem comprehension among fifth-grade students. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 18(2), 181-192.
Gesiradja, M. C., Sudiapermana, E., Lutfiansyach, D. Y., & Shantini, Y. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness, challenges, and contextual applications of the GASING Mathematics method in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Pedagogia Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 23(3), 318-335.
Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218-243.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
Hayati, Z., Satriani, N., Raharti, N., & Hijriati, H. (2024). GASING Mathematics instruction for enhancing problem-solving skills in elementary school students. Genderang Asa: Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 25-36.
Hui, H. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Influence of game-based learning in Mathematics education on the students’ cognitive and affective domain: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1), 1-15.
Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241-253.
Marlina, A. D. D., & Harinaredi, H. (2025). Analysis of the Kurikulum Merdeka on plane figures: A case study of elementary school students. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 4(2), 1639-1650.
Martins, J., Cunha, J., Lopes, S., Moreira, T., & Rosário, P. (2022). School engagement in elementary school: A systematic review of 35 years of research. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 793-849.
Matahelumual, M. M. E., & Yohamintin. (2025). Analisis pengaruh penggunaan metode GASING terhadap pemahaman matematis siswa di sekolah dasar. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(3), 253-266.
Maulida, S. A., Isrokatun, I., & Julia, J. (2024). Pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif TGT dengan metode GASING terhadap pemahaman konsep matematis perkalian dua angka di SD. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 8(1), 101-113.
Munawaroh, A. A., & Nurtamam, M. E. (2024). Pengaruh metode GASING dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis kelas 4 SD berdasarkan gender. Jurnal Didika: Wahana Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2), 288-295.
Myers, J. A., Witzel, B. S., Powell, S. R., Li, H., Pigott, T. D., Xin, Y. P., & Hughes, E. M. (2022). A meta-analysis of Mathematics word-problem solving interventions for elementary students who evidence Mathematics difficulties. Review of Educational Research, 92(5), 695-742.
Nurdianti, D., Sugiyono, S., & Suryatin, S. (2025). Analysis of fourth grade elementary students’ mathematical problem-solving abilities. STEAM Journal for Elementary School Education, 1(2), 64-77.
Putri, S. A. E., & Astuti, S. (2025). The influence of the PBL model on Mathematics learning outcomes in primary school. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 4(2), 1327-1340.
Rahmah, M., & Zulfadewina, Z. (2025). Analysis of fifth-grade students’ numeracy literacy skills in Mathematics. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 4(2), 1847-1858.
Rojo, M., Gersib, J., Powell, S. R., Shen, Z., King, S. G., Akther, S. S., ... & Lin, X. (2024). A meta-analysis of Mathematics interventions: Examining the impacts of intervention characteristics. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 1-10.
Russo, J., Bobis, J., Downton, A., Livy, S., & Sullivan, P. (2021). Primary teacher attitudes towards productive struggle in Mathematics in remote learning versus classroom-based settings. Education Sciences, 11(2), 1-13.
Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2023). Emotions and motivation in Mathematics education: Where we are today and where we need to go. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(2), 249-267.
Siregar, A. F., & Siregar, N. (2025). Smart multiplication media on mathematical problem-solving skills among in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 4(2), 1051-1062.
Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in Mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 1-28.
Trisnani, N., Retnawati, H., & Wuryandani, W. (2024). Challenges of Indonesian elementary school Mathematics teachers in integrating critical thinking into the classroom. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 905-924.
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in Mathematics education: A survey. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(1), 1-16.
Vessonen, T., Hellstrand, H., Kurkela, M., Aunio, P., & Laine, A. (2025). The effectiveness of mathematical word problem-solving interventions among elementary schoolers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 132(1), 1-19.
Wahab, A., Kusuma, Y. S., Juandi, D., Turmudi, T., Buhaerah, B., & Syaiful, S. (2024). Understanding students’ struggles in solving mathematical problems: A systematic literature review using Polya’s framework. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 14(3), 1728-1753.
Xia, Q., Yin, H., Hu, R., Li, X., & Shang, J. (2022). Motivation, engagement, and Mathematics achievement: An exploratory study among Chinese primary students. SAGE Open, 12(4), 1-13.
Zana, F. M., Sa’dijah, C., Susiswo, L. A., Zulnaidi, H., & Zulnaidi, H. (2024). Curriculum and teacher assessment practices in Mathematics learning: Alignment with higher order thinking skills in Indonesian secondary schools. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1311-1334.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dona Oktafiyenti, Arie Rakhmat Riyadi, Andin Dhyas Fitriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



